• Energy production, transmission, and use have climate, ecosystem, and human health effects.

  • Novel and unconventional energy resources require an evidence-based evaluation using the best available scientific information and rigorous, objective scientific studies to evaluate their true costs prior to widespread deployment.

  • The decision to proceed with any energy extraction should be based upon a democratic process taking risk management and informed consent into account.

  • Full life-cycle analysis of energy extraction requires a multi-disciplinary approach involving a range of expertise from a diverse group of qualified individuals.

  • Energy extraction frequently has a disproportionate impact on disadvantaged, disenfranchised and geographically or economically vulnerable populations.

  • The assumption that extraction of unconventional fossil fuels provides a bridge from a non-renewable to a renewable energy economy requires a critical evaluation.

  • Scientists, engineers, and physicians who work together are in a unique position to evaluate the social, health, and environmental dimensions of unconventional energy issues.

  • Alternative proposals are needed to meet global energy requirements and should be based upon principles of energy efficiency, renewability, and health and environmental safety.

There are no products in your shopping cart.