Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research (ROGER)

The Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research, or ROGER, is a near-exhaustive collection of bibliographic information, abstracts, and links to many of journal articles that pertain to shale and tight gas development. The goal of this project is to create a single repository for unconventional oil and gas-related research as a resource for academic, scientific, and citizen researchers.

ROGER currently includes 2152 studies.
Last updated: April 16, 2021

ROGER

Search ROGER

Use keywords or categories (e.g., air quality, climate, health) to identify peer-reviewed studies and view study abstracts.

Research fatigue in unconventional oil and gas boomtowns: Perceptions, strategies and obstacles among social scientists collecting human subjects data
Jacquet et al., March 2021
The perceived impact of fracking on energy security and property values in the United Kingdom: An analysis of interviews with key-informants✰
Jack Adam Lampkin and Matthew Hall, February 2021
Risk in discourses around fracking: a discourse linguistic perspective on the UK, the USA and Germany
Anna Mattfeldt, February 2021
Environmental justice expansion in the context of fracking
Susan T. Zimny and Margaret C. Reardon, February 2021
Up in smoke: characterizing the population exposed to flaring from unconventional oil and gas development in the contiguous US
Cushing et al., February 2021
After the dust settles: Community resilience legacies of unconventional gas development
Hanabeth Luke and Darrick Evensen, January 2021
“It’s our future” : Youth and fracking justice in England
Dunlop et al., January 2021
Reaping Rewards, or Missing out? How Neoliberal Governance and State Growth Machines Condition the Impacts of Oil and Gas Development on Local Well-Being
Mayer et al., December 2020
Connecting Cognitive and Behavioral Characteristics of Policy Conflict in Oil and Gas Politics
Christopher M. Weible and Tanya Heikkila, December 2020
A brief systematic review of the literature on the economic, social and environmental impacts of shale gas exploitation in the United Kingdom
Álvarez-Ramos et al., December 2020
The Goldilocks view: Support and skepticism of the impacts and pace of unconventional oil and gas development in the Bakken Shale of the United States
Ulrich-Schad et al., December 2020
Petro-riskscapes and environmental distress in West Texas: Community perceptions of environmental degradation, threats, and loss
Elser et al., December 2020
Understanding social licence to operate for onshore gas development: How the underlying drivers fit together
Andrea Walton and Rod McCrea, December 2020
Depressed democracy, environmental injustice: Exploring the negative mental health implications of unconventional oil and gas production in the United States
Stephanie A. Malin, December 2020
Valuing shale gas development in resource-dependent communities
Zachary T. Keeler and Heather M. Stephens, December 2020
Partisanship does not tell the full story: The complexities of public opinion and fracking in the United States
Michelle H. W. Lee and Ashley Clark, December 2020
Hydraulic fracturing and political conflict: News media coverage of topics and themes across nine states
Berardo et al., December 2020
Humanizing hydrocarbon frontiers: the “lived experience” of shale gas fracking in the United Kingdom’s Fylde communities
Sovacool et al., November 2020
Corrosive disadvantage: the impact of fracking on young people’s capabilities
Dunlop et al., November 2020
‘Frack off’: Towards an anarchist political ecology critique of corporate and state responses to anti-fracking resistance in the UK
Andrea Brock, October 2020
Visual discourse coalitions: visualization and discourse formation in controversies over shale gas development
Gommeh et al., September 2020
Energy Security, International Investment, and Democracy: The Case of the United States Shale Oil and Gas Industry
Stinchfield et al., September 2020
Oil sands, pipelines and fracking: Citizen acceptance of unconventional fossil fuel development and infrastructure in Canada
Todd Brunner and Jonn Axsen, September 2020
Impacts of Marcellus Shale gas extraction: Examining recollected pre-development and post-development perceptions
Gene L. Theodori and Christopher W. Podeschi, August 2020
Shale gas development and crime: A review of the literature
Paul Stretesky and Philipp Grimmer, July 2020
An assessment of social and environmental impacts of a new shale gas industry in the Vale of Pickering, North Yorkshire
Manon K. Burbidge and C. A. Adams, July 2020
Fracking controversies: Enhancing public trust in local government through energy justice
Marlin-Tackie et al., July 2020
What Shapes Public Engagement in Fracking Issues?
Truong et al., June 2020
Partisanship and proximity predict opposition to fracking in Colorado
Raimi et al., June 2020
Pipelining Appalachia: A perspective on the everyday lived experiences of rural communities at the frontline of energy distribution networks development
Martina Angela Caretta and Kristen Abatsis McHenry, May 2020
Comparing the effects of a news article’s message and source on fracking attitudes in an experimental study
Jacob B. Rode and Peter H. Ditto, April 2020
What do outdoor recreationists think of fracking? Politics, ideology, and perceptions of shale gas energy development in Pennsylvania State Forests
Ferguson et al., April 2020
NIMBY, YIMBY, or something else? Geographies of public perceptions of shale gas development in the Marcellus Shale
Zanocco et al., March 2020
Not under my backyard? Psychological distance, local acceptance, and shale gas development in China
Tan et al., March 2020
In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Community Members
McElroy et al., February 2020
Human-Induced Seismicity: Risk perceptions in the State of Oklahoma
Campbell et al., January 2020
Chemical Exposures, Health, and Environmental Justice in Communities Living on the Fenceline of Industry
Jill Johnston and Lara Cushing, January 2020
Lagging and Flagging: Air Pollution, Shale Gas Exploration and the Interaction of Policy, Science, Ethics and Environmental Justice in England
Andrew Watterson and William Dinan, January 1970
Speaking power to power: Grassroots democracy in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria
Nikolay L. Mihaylov, April 2021
Social Influence, Risk and Benefit Perceptions, and the Acceptability of Risky Energy Technologies: An Explanatory Model of Nuclear Power Versus Shale Gas
Groot et al., April 2021
Key Characteristics Influencing Risk Perceptions of Unconventional Energy Development
Frances A. Marlin-Tackie and Jessica M. Smith, December 2019
Politics, climate change, and earthquakes: Public perceptions of oil and gas impacts in Oklahoma
Gray et al., December 2019
From victims to citizens: Emerging activist identities in the anti-fracking movement in Bulgaria
Nikolay L. Mihaylov, November 2019
Uncertainty and trustworthiness in discussions of fracking: Exploring the views of academic scientists and local governmental representatives
Michelle L. Edwards, November 2019
A social take on unconventional resources: Materiality, alienation and the making of shale gas in Poland and the United Kingdom
Anna Szolucha, November 2019
"Old Town Dentonites": Community members’ competing constructions of hydraulic fracturing and land use in Denton, Texas
Soyer et al., October 2019
Priming the Well: “Frackademia” and the Corporate Pipeline of Oil and Gas Funding into Higher Education
Anthony E. Ladd, October 2019
Many voices in the room: A national survey experiment on how framing changes views toward fracking in the United States
Patrick Bayer and Alexander Ovodenko, October 2019
Context matters: Fracking attitudes, knowledge and trust in three communities in Alberta, Canada
Truong et al., September 2019
The impacts of shale natural gas energy development on outdoor recreation: A statewide assessment of pennsylvanians
Ferguson et al., September 2019