Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research (ROGER)

The Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research, or ROGER, is a near-exhaustive collection of bibliographic information, abstracts, and links to many of journal articles that pertain to shale and tight gas development. The goal of this project is to create a single repository for unconventional oil and gas-related research as a resource for academic, scientific, and citizen researchers.

ROGER currently includes 2303 studies.
Last updated: December 10, 2024

ROGER

Search ROGER

Use keywords or categories (e.g., air quality, climate, health) to identify peer-reviewed studies and view study abstracts.

Attitudes toward hydraulic fracturing: The opposing forces of political conservatism and basic knowledge about fracking
Choma et al., May 2016
Place-based perceptions of the impacts of fracking along the Marcellus Shale
Sangaramoorthy et al., February 2016
Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada
Thomas et al., December 2024
The discursive politics of unconventional gas in Scotland: Drifting towards precaution?
Hannes R. Stephan, December 2024
UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support
Whitmarsh et al., December 2015
Divided Rights, Expanded Conflict: Split Estate Impacts on Surface Owner Perceptions of Shale Gas Drilling
Alan R. Collins and Kofi Nkansah, November 2015
Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues
Graham et al., October 2015
Hydraulic fracturing – Integrating public participation with an independent review of the risks and benefits
Wheeler et al., October 2015
Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: a Q-method study of environmental discourses
Cotton Matthew, September 2015
Differences in Public Perceptions and Leaders’ Perceptions on Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Development
Crowe et al., September 2015
Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom
Williams et al., July 2015
Effect of Providing Information on Students' Knowledge and Concerns about Hydraulic Fracking
Burger et al., May 2015
Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing
Sarge et al., March 2015
Field Survey of Health Perception and Complaints of Pennsylvania Residents in the Marcellus Shale Region
Saberi et al., June 2014
“Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing
Boudet et al., February 2014
Stakeholder Perceptions of Socioenvironmental Impacts from Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the Haynesville Shale
Anthony E. Ladd, July 2013
Assessment and longitudinal analysis of health impacts and stressors perceived to result from unconventional shale gas development in the Marcellus Shale region
Ferrar et al., December 2024
Public Perception of Desalinated Produced Water From Oil and Gas Field Operations: A Replication
Theodori et al., December 2024
Residents' Perceptions of Community and Environmental Impacts from Development of Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: A Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York Cases
Braiser et al., December 2024
A Thematic Analysis of Local Respondents' Perceptions of Barnett Shale Energy Development
Brooklynn J. Wynveen, December 2024

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Pin It on Pinterest

SIGN UP FOR EMAILS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut